Raltey vs Eraser
AI canvas for any diagram vs diagram-as-code-first workflow.
Side by side
Every feature, mapped against Eraser.
Feature
EraserText-to-diagram
AI agent over existing canvas
Image-to-diagram
Real-time collaboration
Per-project docs editor
Limited
DB schema with SQL export
Live integrations (GitHub, Linear, Notion)
GitHub only
Smart node actions (links, webhooks)
Free plan
Yes
3 files
Pro pricing
$15/mo flat
$15/user/mo
Why choose Raltey
- Per-type structured canvas (DB schema with SQL export, mind maps, presentation mode) rather than a single general canvas.
- Live integrations: GitHub repos, Linear issues, Notion docs, and Drive files as nodes that deep-link back.
- Smart node actions: attach a link, webhook, or jump to another Raltey project.
- $15/mo flat Pro plan, not per-seat pricing.
Eraser Strengths
- Diagram-as-code workflow that round-trips with version control.
- Direct GitHub README embedding is mature and pushes diagrams via PRs.
- Eraserbot can keep architecture diagrams in sync with a codebase.
- Image-to-diagram is built in for redrawing screenshots.
The verdict
Bottom line.
Pick Raltey if you want per-type canvases (DB schema with SQL export, presentation mode) and a flat $15/mo plan instead of per-seat. Eraser is the right answer when diagram-as-code in the GitHub repo is the workflow.
Try Raltey instead of Eraser
Free plan includes the AI agent, flow charts, and GitHub. No card required.